To ken or not to ken

And out of the grind the LOUD Gov farmed every butt of the failed, and every fool of the air, and brought them unto Adman to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adman called every living creature, that was the name thereof. Person with ADHD, he called them. Person with ADD, ASD, SAD, OCD, BPD, NPD… And many felt relief to have a name for their experience; felt less alone knowing others experienced the same.

Scoliosis is easy to diagnose. Anyone can see it. (Like the batshit stranger who waylays me at the pool and spouts details of her own treatment.) And over time, despite corrective surgery in my teens, my spinal curve has visibly worsened: a lateral (and literal) S compounded by three-level rotation. I noticed about ten years ago that my torso looked more crooked than in the last pre-op X-rays. But my quest for help got shelved as my 90-something mother wilfully waived all self-responsibility. Such challenges as a fractured knee when a car hit me, a surf injury, coordinating my mother’s carers and keeping her out of hospital, finding her a nice nursing home and selling her house to pay the deposit amid chronic sleep loss (demonic neighbours) distracted me. Yet my gut had begun to jut out though I hadn’t gained weight, and my clothes didn’t hang straight. Then my mother’s funeral video showed a budding hunchback. So each month now, my physio measures me and we tweak my stretches.

Compared to an observable curvature, disorders described in the DSM-5 are hard to diagnose. I can’t see, say, ADHD in a stranger. Nor in a close acquaintance who claims to have it. We’ve shared many exchanges and I find her spontaneous, yet not unduly unfocused or hyper. How did she know? She read a book about it. But I’m not so sure. The symptoms she named just sound like traits at odds with oppressive cultural norms. Yet she’s more attached than I am to the pay-offs for playing the game. The thought of taking a pill for it appealed to her. But, I said, what about side effects? We don’t always see I to I; she prefers the sound of her own voice to mine. And her kind tend to embrace, if not condone, the dominant culture, which spews quick fixes, quick quizzes and fads: DNA test kits from ancestry.com, star-sign columns, ‘Are you a narcissist?’ articles. If the profile fits, just click on the nearest ad.

And as we do, capitalism works not just on but in and through us, ceaselessly surveilling, quantifying, analysing, labelling and codifying all our behaviours, problematising difference or irregularities, ramping up stress by prompting comparison, ergo competition, while simultaneously training us to monitor ourselves, then, when we fall short, selling us products and services geared to promote dependency, off which corporations profit. And since none of these treatments can remedy the emptiness of an essentially manufactured vacuum, most of us stay on the treadmill of craving: passive consumers waiting for the next text, call, update or new release, looking forward to weekends, study breaks, annual leave, Christmas, New Year’s Eve, Valentine’s, Easter, EOFY sales, Halloween, birthdays, anniversaries, civic festivities, happy hour, happy endings, tax refunds and dividends; anticipating each vaccination, test result, regular check-up or token changing of the guard that simulates democratic election.

Tokens in every possible form have become the mainstay of our culture. In the progressive absence of direct connection, we trade commercially made and marketed symbols of affection. Our memories look increasingly like photos and videos. We pay lip service to intimacy while incessantly caressing devices. And as we value tokens, we devalue lived reality. When I google ‘are we living’, the top autocomplete option reads:

are we living in a simulation

Why ask? What difference does it make if we’re all going to hell in a handcart and have been for decades, during which our strip-mined, deforested, monocropped, toxified, hottening planet has only gained momentum on its downhill trajectory? As warning signs and tipping points whizz by, we stand divided. The mainstream media suggests the AI con will be offset by the pros of a utopian, virtual, post-human future in which robots + nanotech replace nature, autonomy and embodiment. Meanwhile, dissident prophets preach prepping for a dystopian epoch of epic shortages, power outages, overgrown ruins, nomadic resurgence and retreat to low-tech rural communities, viewing AI as a mere dead end, not the dawn of Armageddon. Readers of media captured by multibillionaire donors bank on the promise of high-tech solutions to mind-blowing problems; if humans alone or combined can’t find answers, maybe AI can. So they lap up the Kool-Aid and hope the unholy alliance of state and corporate power that gave us an overstated pandemic and an understated recession will save them.

Kudos to those who dare to divest from the corporate-capitalist nexus, return to the land and grow their own food. But many more Westerners want the best of both worlds; they drive big hybrids, fly to secluded retreats, eat imported organics and overuse renewables as oil and gas deplete. And we all enact contradictions, consciously or not – reviling societal evils while tamely enabling them because we lack the time, skills, guts, means or will to push back.

Carl Jung, father of archetypal psychology, who derived some key insights from astrology, recognised that moments in time have a quality. Each is unique despite cyclic recurrence of themes. And this quality of time, revealed through history (a forest is hard to see from among the trees), manifests independently of petty human doings. The idea that we went wrong with agriculture/monotheism/industrialisation is nonsense, if only because collective drives aren’t conscious. Yet the ego demonises unwelcome developments (threats to cherished or useful species like butterflies and bees, destruction of ancient sacred sites by mining etc.) – anything with which the ego identifies. And that which the ego deems other, it rejects – blind to endless and varied connections that inextricably bind what it wants to what it dreads.

Where do I stand? Mostly left or right of centre; depends on which vertebra you sight. But for me, nature taking its course meant a descent into disability. Contra feedback from some physios, intervention is needed. Yet my body resists my attempts to untwist with muscular pain, boredom fogs my brain, and when progress slows or reverses I feel regret that I delayed finding help and, far worse, acquiesced to surgery.

It’s a micro analogy of the broader reality. For me to see the mechanistic fix of a titanium implant as a wrong turn in my journey is akin to ruing the invention of computers. At the time, the op that redefined my future seemed simple. Yet implications continue to proliferate. And others in my shoes might choose the path of least resistance: to vacate their screwed-up bodies, withdraw to their heads, and go with the flow of a system bent on imprisoning us in the net. Why make waves if all paths end at death?

But intelligence doesn’t reside only in the mind. Hence our sedentary society has lost perspective. And our world keeps hurtling further out of balance (at least in my view; I’m skewed too). But when was the world ever in balance? Isn’t existence rather always passing from one phase to the next? The stage we’ve reached in this digital age manifests through labels, logos, avatars, icons, emoticons, hashtags, tattoos, bonus points, carbon credits, gift cards, QR codes, certificates, petitions and countless other tokens, and to deny it is to dissociate. We can exploit or cringe at, adapt to or fight it, but we can’t exist outside of it.

This entry was posted in psychopolitics, the life of the writer and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.